How the hell can you make such a fuzz over such a thing?
You think the old AD&D contained boatloads of stupid stuff? I sure think so. Ignore it! Nobody used all that stuff anyway. If they did, we had more fun than them. Wrongbadfun, right?
You think WotC must|must not include whatever such moronic stuff in their new game? Well, who cares about that Type V thing, when we have the old stuff, right? Right?
And if you are a moronic misogynistic twit, I will just ignore you.
The 'net is full of idiots. Ignore them.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
Misogyny is definitely bad, but what are you ranting against exactly? Who is making a fuss about what?
ReplyDeleteWay too many people have been posting on AD&D limiting female stats and suchlike. As far as I've found out, it was WotC that asked what people wanted in 5th ed and included a highlight of Gygaxism, some weirder than others.
ReplyDeleteI mean, why bother?
Ah I see. Some people seem to want to put off women from roleplaying. I don't understand why. :-(
ReplyDeleteI don't like gender limits but i'm not outraged if people want to talk about. While i'm normally a big proponent of simulationism, gender limits seems unnecessarily simulationist.
ReplyDelete